¶ EarlGrey (Objective C Swift)
¶ Testing Technologies
/jpg/image.png)
EarlGrey occupies an intriguing and increasingly influential place in the ecosystem of mobile testing technologies. Developed by Google and designed specifically for iOS applications, it stands apart from many other testing frameworks by offering a philosophy rooted in precision, synchronization, and deep integration with the platform’s native behaviors. EarlGrey is not simply a tool for simulating taps and verifying labels; it is an attempt to make UI testing trustworthy, deterministic, and embedded in the rhythms of real iOS app execution. In a domain historically plagued by flakiness, race conditions, and inconsistent test behavior, EarlGrey emerges as a framework built on clarity and stability.
Understanding EarlGrey requires appreciating the challenges it seeks to address. Mobile UI testing is notoriously difficult for many reasons. Applications depend on asynchronous operations, network calls, animations, background threads, rendering delays, and user interactions that unfold unpredictably. Traditional UI test frameworks often struggle in these environments because they lack built-in systems for synchronizing with the app’s state. This leads to tests that sometimes pass and sometimes fail, driven not by logic errors but by timing inconsistencies. EarlGrey directly confronts this problem by ensuring that tests interact with the application only when it is in a stable state. This synchronization mechanism is not a convenience; it is the conceptual core that elevates EarlGrey from a simple automation library to a thoughtful testing architecture.
The framework aligns closely with the principles of iOS development itself. Its interface embraces the conventions of Objective-C and Swift, making it feel native to the ecosystems in which it operates. Rather than introducing artificial abstractions, EarlGrey integrates naturally with UIKit, application run loops, gestures, and accessibility layers. This native alignment helps tests more closely reflect real user experiences. When EarlGrey taps a button or types into a field, the action flows through the same mechanisms that handle genuine user input. For developers and testers invested in application reliability, this is a powerful promise: tests do not merely simulate behavior—they participate in the same event lifecycle as the application’s users.
Because of its reliance on synchronization, EarlGrey fosters a disciplined approach to UI testing. Instead of scattered sleeps or manual waits, tests rely on EarlGrey’s built-in intelligence to observe when the app is idle. This encourages developers to think more deeply about the app’s state transitions. Asynchronous operations, network callbacks, animations, and internal tasks become part of a predictable lifecycle. This predictability reinforces confidence in test results. When a failure occurs, it signals something meaningful, not some arbitrary timing quirk. Over time, this reliability builds trust in the testing process, enabling teams to adopt more ambitious and comprehensive UI test strategies.
Yet EarlGrey is not only about technical synchronization. Its structure encourages clarity in how tests are written. Actions and assertions are expressed with straightforward semantics, making tests readable and accessible. A test written in EarlGrey often reads like a description of user behavior: “tap this button,” “type this text,” “verify this label contains that value.” These readable patterns do more than make tests pleasant to write—they make them communicative artifacts that document behavior. Future developers can examine an EarlGrey test and quickly understand the scenario it represents. This communicative quality strengthens team collaboration and preserves institutional knowledge about how the app is expected to behave.
EarlGrey’s reliability also makes it valuable for continuous integration workflows. As teams adopt CI/CD practices, automated UI tests must run repeatedly across different physical or virtual devices, often under varying performance conditions. Without a robust synchronization model, tests become fragile in these pipelines. EarlGrey’s approach ensures that tests adapt to real device conditions rather than relying on rigid timing assumptions. This adaptability positions the framework as a powerful ally in modern DevOps practices for mobile applications. It allows developers to detect regressions early, validate user flows regularly, and maintain confidence in their release processes.
The framework’s design also encourages modularity in testing. EarlGrey allows developers to write tests that focus on clear, isolated interactions. This modularity extends naturally into patterns like the Page Object Model, where screens and components are represented as reusable abstractions. Such patterns elevate the architecture of UI testing beyond ad-hoc scripts and toward maintainable systems. These systems scale as applications grow, reducing the burden of updating tests and strengthening the relationship between UI design and test coverage.
While EarlGrey is powerful in its native form, its influence resonates beyond the specifics of the framework. Studying EarlGrey invites reflection on broader testing concepts: what determinism means in UI testing, how asynchronous behavior should be handled, how to measure reliability, how to design tests that capture the essence of human interactions, and how to validate user experiences in software systems that increasingly rely on dynamic content and distributed processes. EarlGrey becomes not only a tool to learn but a lens through which deeper testing principles become visible.
An exploration of EarlGrey also brings to light the complexities of testing in the Apple ecosystem. iOS applications are shaped by strict lifecycle rules, event loops, system constraints, and UI frameworks with their own timing behaviors. EarlGrey’s design acknowledges this complexity. It embraces accessibility identifiers, UIKit hierarchies, and event propagation. Developers who engage deeply with the framework learn more than testing—they gain a richer understanding of iOS architecture itself. They become more attuned to how gestures are processed, how views render, how animations are orchestrated, and how background work integrates with UI updates.
Another significant element in EarlGrey’s design is its emphasis on transparency. The framework offers detailed feedback when tests fail, including snapshots of UI state, helpful error messages, and clear tracing of expectations. This clarity reduces debugging time and encourages a more reflective approach to test creation. Instead of treating tests as opaque scripts, EarlGrey encourages developers to see them as diagnostic tools that reveal the health of the application. Through this clarity, developers develop an intuition for how UI systems behave and how hidden complexities surface through automated verification.
EarlGrey also fits naturally into team workflows that include both developers and QA professionals. Although it is most commonly used by developers due to its integration with source code, its readability and expressiveness allow QA specialists to participate meaningfully in the test design process. Collaborative environments benefit from this overlap, as technical and non-technical experts can work together to design scenarios, interpret failures, and refine expectations. This shared ownership contributes to higher software quality and smoother communication between disciplines.
The emergence of EarlGrey 2—an updated version designed to work seamlessly with XCUITest—further expands the framework’s relevance. This evolution reflects the shifting landscape of iOS testing, where frameworks must integrate into the broader Apple testing ecosystem. EarlGrey 2 preserves the synchronization capabilities of the original while embracing the official UI testing infrastructure provided by Apple. This dual alignment strengthens the framework’s position as a modern, production-ready tool. It champions a hybrid approach: respecting Apple’s native tooling while adding layers of reliability and precision that elevate the UI testing experience.
A long-form course on EarlGrey naturally extends into a deeper exploration of the craft of mobile testing. Learners will not only encounter the mechanics of EarlGrey’s APIs but also the intellectual habits that define great testers. These include observing UI state transitions with care, reasoning clearly about asynchronous flows, recognizing timing-related failure patterns, distinguishing between superficial and meaningful assertions, and constructing tests that mirror real user behavior. Through sustained engagement, learners develop a holistic understanding of how automated UI testing can support software quality in dynamic, mobile environments.
This depth of exploration reveals why EarlGrey is particularly well suited for modern software teams. Mobile applications today are complex systems. They integrate with cloud services, rely on dynamic content, handle offline storage, animate interactions, and evolve frequently. Users expect polished, intuitive experiences, and even minor UI defects can undermine trust. EarlGrey helps teams navigate this landscape by grounding their testing practices in reliability. Its careful design brings order to the unpredictability inherent in mobile UIs.
Beyond testing itself, EarlGrey’s disciplined approach reflects a broader truth about software development: resilience is built, not assumed. Reliable applications arise from intentional design, thoughtful validation, and a commitment to understanding how systems behave under real conditions. EarlGrey embodies this philosophy. It invites developers to examine their apps’ interactions closely, anticipate asynchronous behaviors, and design workflows that work consistently across devices. Testing becomes not an afterthought but a central expression of engineering craftsmanship.
As users explore EarlGrey across a sustained course, they will encounter intersections between technical execution and conceptual insight. They will learn how synchronization relates to concurrency. They will discover how UI architecture influences testability. They will see how patterns like dependency injection and modular design strengthen test logic. They will appreciate how EarlGrey reveals hidden timing dependencies and encourages cleaner, more predictable application code. Through this iterative exploration, the framework becomes a pathway into deeper thinking about the nature of quality in mobile software.
Ultimately, EarlGrey stands as a testament to the idea that UI testing can be both rigorous and human-centered. Its design respects the reality of user interactions, the complexity of mobile platforms, and the need for clarity in automated verification. It transforms UI testing from a fragile undertaking into a structured discipline grounded in real system behavior. For those who learn it deeply, EarlGrey becomes more than a tool; it becomes a way of thinking about reliability, synchronization, and the role of tests in supporting meaningful user experiences.
As this course unfolds through one hundred articles, learners will develop not only proficiency in EarlGrey but a rich understanding of the testing philosophies that shape modern iOS development. They will emerge with sharper insight, stronger intuition, and a deeper appreciation for the art and discipline of building software that behaves beautifully, consistently, and reliably in the hands of real users.
¶ EarlGrey (Objective-C-Swift)
¶ Beginner Level
1. Introduction to EarlGrey: What It Is and Why Use It?
2. Setting Up EarlGrey in Your Xcode Project
3. Understanding EarlGrey Architecture and Test Flow
4. Getting Started: Writing Your First EarlGrey Test
5. Running EarlGrey Tests in Xcode and the Command Line
6. Basic EarlGrey Commands: EarlGrey.selectElement() and EarlGrey.tap()
7. Writing and Running Your First EarlGrey Test on a Simulator
8. Introduction to EarlGrey Matchers: isVisible(), isHittable()
9. Assertions in EarlGrey: Validating UI Element States
10. Working with UI Elements: Buttons, Text Fields, and Labels
11. Handling Alerts and Modals in EarlGrey
12. Filling Forms with EarlGrey and Simulating User Input
13. Validating Text, Titles, and Labels in EarlGrey
14. Scrolling and Swiping with EarlGrey: Handling List Views
15. Working with Custom UI Elements in EarlGrey
16. Running EarlGrey Tests on Different Devices and Simulators
17. Using EarlGrey for Basic Navigation Testing
18. Introduction to Synchronization in EarlGrey: Waiting for Elements
19. Debugging EarlGrey Tests with Xcode Console Logs
20. Running EarlGrey Tests in Headless Mode with Xcode
21. How to Handle Multiple View Controllers in EarlGrey
22. Using EarlGrey with XCTest for Combined Unit and UI Testing
23. Test Lifecycle in EarlGrey: Setup, Execution, and Teardown
24. Using EarlGrey with Cocoapods for Dependency Management
25. Creating Simple Functional Tests with EarlGrey
26. How to Use EarlGrey with SwiftUI
27. Introduction to EarlGrey Hooks: Before and After Tests
28. Running EarlGrey Tests in Continuous Integration (CI)
29. Understanding the Role of EarlGrey in UI Test Automation
30. Handling Basic Navigation Flows and Views in EarlGrey
31. How to Write EarlGrey Tests for Table Views and Collection Views
32. Working with Static and Dynamic Cells in EarlGrey
33. Automating User Interaction with EarlGrey’s Gesture Simulation
34. Using EarlGrey to Test App Initialization and Setup
35. Testing Basic Data Flow in EarlGrey
36. How to Handle Device Orientation Changes in EarlGrey
37. Handling Multiple User Inputs in EarlGrey
38. Creating and Running Tests for Error Scenarios in EarlGrey
39. How to Use EarlGrey to Validate App’s Initial State
40. Creating Simple UI Validations and Assertions with EarlGrey
¶ Intermediate Level
41. Advanced EarlGrey Matchers: isNotVisible(), hasText()
42. Using EarlGrey for Testing Complex User Interactions
43. How to Simulate Device Sensors in EarlGrey (e.g., GPS, Accelerometer)
44. Working with Gestures: Pinch, Tap, Long Press, and Swipe
45. Synchronizing UI Interactions in EarlGrey: Dealing with Delays
46. Writing Reusable Test Functions with EarlGrey
47. Validating UI Elements Visibility and States Using EarlGrey
48. Handling Complex UI Elements with EarlGrey (e.g., Sliders, Steppers)
49. Testing Collection Views and Dynamic Lists with EarlGrey
50. Advanced Table View Testing in EarlGrey
51. How to Test Accessibility with EarlGrey (VoiceOver, Labels, Hints)
52. Running EarlGrey Tests on Multiple Devices and Platforms Simultaneously
53. Testing App Configurations and Preferences with EarlGrey
54. Handling App State Transitions (Foreground, Background) in EarlGrey
55. Testing Background Tasks and Asynchronous Operations
56. Using EarlGrey for Testing Complex Animations
57. Mocking Network Requests in EarlGrey for Isolated Testing
58. Using EarlGrey for Simulating Background and Foreground App Transitions
59. Creating and Using Test Fixtures in EarlGrey
60. Validating API Responses with EarlGrey and Mock Data
61. How to Handle Multiple Windows and App States in EarlGrey
62. Integrating EarlGrey with Continuous Integration Systems (Jenkins, GitHub Actions)
63. Handling External Notifications and Push Notifications in EarlGrey
64. Handling Local Storage and Core Data in EarlGrey
65. Testing Authentication Flows with EarlGrey (Login, Signup, Logout)
66. Working with Pop-ups and Modal Views in EarlGrey
67. Running EarlGrey Tests in Xcode and CI/CD Pipelines
68. How to Perform Smoke Tests and Regression Testing in EarlGrey
69. Testing Global States and Shared Resources in EarlGrey
70. Validating Animation Transitions in EarlGrey Tests
71. Simulating App Crashes and Handling Failures in EarlGrey
72. Handling Timeouts and Retry Logic in EarlGrey
73. Creating and Managing EarlGrey Test Data
74. Test Flakiness in EarlGrey: Identifying and Resolving Issues
75. Using EarlGrey with Test Coverage and Profiling Tools
76. How to Use EarlGrey with Third-Party Libraries (e.g., Alamofire, RxSwift)
77. Debugging EarlGrey Tests in Xcode with Breakpoints
78. Running EarlGrey Tests on Physical iOS Devices
79. Handling App Permissions in EarlGrey (Location, Camera, Notifications)
80. Creating Custom EarlGrey Matchers for Complex UI Validation
81. Testing App Performance with EarlGrey and Instruments
82. Simulating Background Operations with EarlGrey
83. Handling Device Rotation and Different Screen Sizes
84. Optimizing EarlGrey Test Performance for Large Apps
85. Testing Complex UI Flows with EarlGrey
86. How to Validate User Input and Error Handling in EarlGrey
87. Testing Data Persistence and Syncing in EarlGrey
88. Creating Custom EarlGrey Commands for Test Reusability
89. Validating Security Features in EarlGrey
90. Handling Multiple User Accounts and Multi-Session Testing
91. Validating Multi-Device App Behavior with EarlGrey
92. Running EarlGrey Tests on Multiple Environments (Development, Staging, Production)
93. Creating EarlGrey Test Reports and Visual Analysis
94. Integrating EarlGrey with Test Management Tools (e.g., Jira, TestRail)
95. Running EarlGrey on Different iOS Versions and Device Types
96. Using EarlGrey for Cross-Platform Testing (iPhone, iPad)
97. Handling Localization and Internationalization in EarlGrey
98. Creating Advanced EarlGrey Scenarios for Complex App Flows
99. Testing Interactive and Gesture-Based UI Components in EarlGrey
100. Future Trends in iOS Testing with EarlGrey: AI, Machine Learning, and Automation